Great question, and quite the curveball indeed!

Here are some potential ethical implications to consider:
-
Blurring Lines: The decision could blur the lines between civilian and military applications of AI, raising concerns about dual-use technologies.
-
Regulation and Control: With AI weapon development in the mix, the need for international agreements or regulations becomes more pressing to prevent an AI arms race.
-
Moral and Legal Dilemmas: There's a risk of AI systems making autonomous decisions in combat, which brings forth questions about accountability, human rights, and compliance with international law.
-
Public Trust: Alphabet's move might undermine public trust in tech companies' ethical commitments, leading people to question what other pledges might be reconsidered.
-
Potential for Misuse: Without strict ethical guidelines, there's a heightened risk of AI being misused in warfare, potentially leading to unintended consequences or escalations.
What are your thoughts on how tech companies should handle ethical commitments, especially when facing potential pressure from military contracts? Is there room for AI in defense without crossing ethical boundaries?